There are folks who really don't like Hillary Rodham-Clinton, but I do. Hillary's a strong individual with conviction.
There are many who like Laura Bush as, "...she's got morals -and values." Frankly, I don't care for her. However, she recently tried urging her husband to name a woman or minority to replace Sandra Day O'Connor; he wouldn't listen.
W's morals are based back in the 18th century and probably still views his wife as property. Hence, his decision to nominate John Robert to the Supreme Court.
I'm afraid. I'm very afraid.
Tuesday, July 19, 2005
You're Not the Boss of Me!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Stumble It!
3 comments:
If HRC is a liar, then we need to coin a new term for "W"s habitual truth-bending comments. The only thing that is bothering me about HRC is that she appears to be getting a little soft in trying to keep as many supporters as possible. I want someone who is not trying to appease everyone. We do need a woman president though and it appears she is about the only one wanting to step up.
Regarding,
I want someone who is not trying to appease everyone.
Hence the problem with W. W does not listen to the American public. B sucessfully turned around his terms in office because he listened and H will do the same thing. W still has not figured out that invading Iraq was not a good idea.
I may have used the incorrect word and agree with what you (Larry) said. Of course, we want someone who listens well. We all know that W has his own agenda and sees himself as knowing what is always right. What bothers me most is no matter how many times evidence points another direction, he goes about in his same manner with no consideration of facts. My dad always said that those who know for a fact they are always right will eventually find out that others have known they were wrong much of the time. Another note-Hilary seems to be making progress.
Post a Comment